The result: 1. Set all to false PUT Customer/10000 { "printInvoices": { "value": false }, "acceptAutoInvoices": { "value": false }, "sendInvoicesByEmail": { "value": false }, "printStatements": { "value": false }, "sendStatementsByEmail": { "value": false }, "printMultiCurrencyStatements": { "value": false } } 2. Set all to true PUT Customer/10000 { "printInvoices": { "value": true }, "acceptAutoInvoices": { "value": true }, "sendInvoicesByEmail": { "value": true }, "printStatements": { "value": true }, "sendStatementsByEmail": { "value": true }, "printMultiCurrencyStatements": { "value": true } } ... View more

Hi,   The JSON should look like this:   { "sendInvoicesByEmail" : { "value" : true } } We have just tested this and the update goes through without issues. Regarding fields that you wish were exposed, please write a post in the ideas part of the forum. The posts there will be reviewed by the development team.   Thank you.  ... View more

Hi, As of right now a POST method is not exposed for the employee endpoint.  We'll move this thread to ideas so that other users may also vote for exposing this. ... View more

Hi,  We're looking in to this and will get back to you. ... View more

Hi, The easiest way to handle settings like this for customers, is to have customerClasses set up with them and then setting the class on the customer. ... View more

Thank you, we'll have a look and get back to you.  ... View more

Hi, "InvoiceNbr" & "SalesOrderNbr" is exposed via GET "shipment" endpoint in "shipmentOrderLines": "shipmentOrderLines": [ { "orderType": "SO", "orderNbr": "000012", "shippedQty": 1, "shippedWeight": 0, "shippedVolume": 0, "invoiceType": "INV", "invoiceNbr": "000029" } ]   In the backlog, we have a couple of cases that are connected to this: Create a filter for "SalesOrderNbr" via the "Shipment" Endpoint Expose the "Shipment" tab ("ShipmentNbr" & "InvoiceNbr") via "SalesOrder" Endpoint "READ" Apart from this, the current situation is that "customerInvoice" is split in  two modules. Invoices and Memos & Customer Invoice : ScreenID=AR301000 - ARInvoiceEntry managing nonstock invoices Logistic Sales Invoices: ScreenID=SO303000 - SOInvoiceEntry managing stock and non-stock invoices As of today, Customer Invoice Endpoint is only able to fetch(GET) invoices from both pools yet unable to realize other listed functionalities for Sales-Logistic Component created invoices.   We have a request in the backlog for an endpoint for the logistic sales invoices as well.  ... View more

This case is still being investigated and we will provide you with more information as soon as we hear any progress in the case.  ... View more

Hi,   As "." is a reserved URL character, you need to use the b64 method that was added earlier this year. Please have a look at this article and let us know if it helped you:  Method for getting resources with reserved characters - B64URL Encoding Thank you.  ... View more

Alright, could you please send us an example of what you would include in your initial post, and then the put for your request, you can attach this as a text file. We'll have a look and test this according to your scenario. Thank you.  ... View more

Is this poReceipt linked to an order? And the line that you want to delete, is it the only line in the receipt? Does this happen when you send the delete by itself as well, or only when you delete one line and add another? ... View more

Hi, Good suggestion, we'll look into getting this sorted.   Thank you.  ... View more

Hi,   We are not able to reproduce this.   First, we created a purchaseOrder with 2 items in the UI, from this a purchaseReceipt was created.  Before updating, no allocations has been made automatically:   We then try to update it with just 1 allocation line and receive the error:   When sending both allocations that are needed, the PUT goes through and both lines are allocated:   Please make sure there are no other items in the receipt that needs to be added, please make a get request and review the response to see if there are other lines that have been used. You can send us the response in a file and we can have a look at it as well.   ... View more

There is a case in the backlog for this, however we don't have any influence over when the implementation will be done, as soon as we here anything we'll inform you.  ... View more

Hi, As mentioned above, this endpoint only mentions that the process has started.  Regarding an implementation to return error on failed release, we don't have a timeframe to share as of now. ... View more

Hi, we're looking at it and we'll get back to you soon. ... View more

What settings does the item have for serial/lot? Are you sure you are applying a new serial and location for each item?   Please also try to not send lineNumber 1 on both operations, even though lineNumber on insert operation has earlier been ignored, there might be significance to the same line first being inserted, although it already exists on the receipt and then being updated.  ... View more

Hi, This is unfortunately not exposed via the Visma.Net Financials API. We'll send you an email with information regarding Approval API, they might have a solution.    Thank you.  ... View more

Hi, Please send us a screenshot from where you would do this in the UI and the steps you need to take, and we can help you see.   ... View more

Hi, There has not been any news regarding this as of yet. We will inform you when we have more details.  ... View more

Hi,   We are not able to reproduce this:   Could you please doublecheck on your end? Please send us a screenshot of the inventoryItem in the UI's salesCategories and the API response for that item.   Regarding the last part, as mentioned in the other thread, there is a case in the backlog for the development to have a look at this.   Thank you.  ... View more

Ok, please let us know if we can do anything else. ... View more

Hi, it depends in the document. For PurchaseOrderReceipt there is not currently any webhooks.  ... View more

Hi, Could you please check this in the UI again, is it still possible to perform the same operation that you want to perform in the UI? If so, to be able to test this we would need to see and recreate the POReceipt. Could you please let us know what is in the receipt, and if you have done anything special with it.    Thank you.  ... View more

Hi. As mentioned, there is no time frame that we can tell you that will work definitely. It depends on the size of the document amongst other things, just as you can see happens in the UI. What you can do until there is a better solution in place to make sure that you know when the operation is done, is to GET the document and check the status. If it is released add it to the invoice. ... View more

Hi,   We are looking into this. As per the documentation, the location endpoint correspondes to the UI screen CustomerLocations(ScreenId=CR303010). However, in the UI there is a bug that lists all suppliers here as well, this is unintended as it should only include suppliers that are also customers. For this there is a case in the backlog.   There has been a case in the backlog for a supplierLocations endpoint as well and we will inform the development team that this has been requested again.   As the data differs on the customerLocations and supplierLocations it was previously decided that there is a need for two endpoint. However, we will forward the information to the development team so they can assess what needs to be done.    Thank you.  ... View more