About ErikW

Gabriel Acosta · ‎05-05-2025

Awesome!

Oskar Jansson · ‎28-04-2025

Hi, the problems should be fixed now. Please contact us if you have any more problems after April 26th. Postmortem from the incident: “Our queueing service for background tasks was not working optimally and was not able to scale according to the load. We improved the mechanism so that scaling is more robust and will scale resources faster according to load.”

Oskar Jansson · ‎01-04-2025

Hi, to thoroughly investigate this issue, we need to examine the details involved. As this may require reviewing the company-specific configuration, I recommend reaching out to the support teams specific to your country. Please see https://community.visma.com/t5/Forum-in-Developers-Visma-net/Update-on-Visma-net-ERP-API-Support-channels/m-p/633804#M4710

ErikW · ‎17-02-2025

Hi we are experiencing recurring intermittent issues related to creation and updating of supplier invoices in multiple company instances. Among these are tenants with company id: 5438022 and 5403385. We have yet not intercepted exactly what fails but will investigate from our end. These problems occur in a commodified and standardized integration product that runs for over 100 tenants so I was curious if you on your end can see anything out of the ordinary in the logs related to these companies and the supplier invoice endpoints? Will update if and when we are able to narrow down our issues.

Suzdar Ibrahim · ‎04-02-2025

Hi ErikW! Which field are you ref. to ? Do you have a screenshot or example? BR Suzdar

Oskar Jansson · ‎31-01-2025

Hi, could you try deselecting the bottom-most scope and then try again? I think that might be causing the error

carl_maddenanalytics · ‎12-12-2024

Is there any news regarding this? I am having the same issue and need to set destination warehouse when creating a transfer order. Any workarounds? Thankful for any pointers!

Oskar Jansson · ‎11-11-2024

Has this problem been resolved, or do your customers still experience IPPExceptions?

Marten Voort · ‎30-09-2024

In the next release (version 10.20) this problem is solved. Let us know if the situation still occurs.

Sandra Anté · ‎06-02-2024

Hi Erik! Can you please specify the workflow that you've used so far so that we can replicate it in our environment? Please also include JSON for the transfer order if possible. Otherwise include screenshots from sales order (ScreenID=SO301000). Thank you! Kind regards Sandra

Yıldırım · ‎17-01-2024

Hi Erik, I can confirm the issue. This has been escalated as a bug and will be reviewed. 1) Create a KIT Item with multiple Warehouse (Warehouse Details: 1-Default, 2 Optional) 2) POST KIT Assembly with that KIT Item specifying the non-default warehouse in the payload. { "type": "P", "hold": { "value": false }, "date": { "value": "2024-01-17" }, "itemId": { "value": "KIT01" }, "revision": { "value": "1" }, "description": { "value": "string" }, "warehouse": { "value": "2" }, "location": { "value": "1" }, "quantity": { "value": 1 } } Output: 3) Check "Inventory Transaction History", it'll show the movement based on warehouse "1" even though we've specified Warehouse"2" 4) Create KIT Assembly manually in the ERP UI with Warehouse "2" 5) Check "Inventory Transaction History" again. Now, it shows the movement correctly, Warehouse "2"

Yıldırım · ‎28-09-2023

Hello, we're unable to reproduce the issue. Regardless of the pageNumber, the whole data should be filtered based on the query param. Could you please send us your company-ID & API Client details with DB restore approval ? <developersupport@visma.com>

Magnus Johnsen · ‎15-09-2023

That would help, please send it to DeveloperSupport@visma.com. Thank you.

ErikW · ‎14-08-2023

Hi I have a customer that would like to be able to set the field "kundreferens" (Customer Reference) via the API when we create a customer invoice. Please see the included picture for the field I am referring to. Is this possible? The field seems to be a free text input field in the UI as far as I can tell. Regards, Erik

Yıldırım · ‎08-06-2023

Hello Erik, unfortunately this connection described in the UI is not available via the API. I'd recommend you creating an Idea by describing the process steps and corresponding module to be reviewed for implementation to the API.

ErikW · ‎21-02-2023

Hi, Just wondering if you could give me an indication as to when this might be resolved?

Magnus Johnsen · ‎11-08-2022

For get specific project, the attribute field is always returned if it has any attributes set. For the get all endpoint it is documented:

Magnus Johnsen · ‎17-05-2022

Hi, There are occasionally some issue related to the cache not being updated, however there is no documentation regarding this and it is not always a problem.

Re: Landed Cost functionality for POST SupplierInv...

Re: Creating journaltransaction using background j...

Re: About performance in creating journaltransacti...

Intermittent issues with supplier invoices

Re: Regarding custom fields in SalesOrderV3

Re: Error when authenticating in swagger using int...

Re: Creating Transfer orders

Re: Recurring 5520 errors when getting supplier in...

Re: Error "tstamp cannot be empty" when doing a PU...

Svar: Transfer orders purchase receipt 400 error

Re: Kitassembly does not respect chosen Warehouse

Re: Setting financialPeriod for CustomerInvoice Ge...

Re: Error when trying to retrieve customerCreditNo...

Set/overwrite customer reference on customer invoi...

Re: Associate deferred revenue transactions with i...

Re: /controller/api/v1/GeneralLedgerTransactions s...

Re: Including Attributes when getting multiple Pro...

Re: JournalTransaction V2 problem with new company

Useful pages

About Visma

Contact us

Follow us